Bill S-3: Eliminating known sex-based inequities in registration
Find out what the Government of Canada is doing to ensure equity between the sexes in registration.
Bill S-3 now fully in force
On August 15, 2019, the 1951 cut-off date was removed from the registration provisions.
The third and final report to Parliament on the review of the implementation of S-3 was tabled on December 11, 2020.
On this page
- Bill S-3, An Act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général)
- How S-3 changed the Indian Act (video)
- What changes did Bill S-3 bring to the Indian Act
- Are you now entitled to registration under Bill S-3
- Reporting to Parliament
- The Government of Canada's engagement with First Nations and Indigenous groups
Bill S-3, An Act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général)
On December 22, 2017, changes were made to the Indian Act by Bill S-3, An Act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général), to address known sex-based inequities in registration.
More amendments came into force on August 15, 2019, after the Government of Canada held national consultations with First Nations and Indigenous groups during the collaborative process on Indian registration, band membership and First Nation citizenship. Throughout those engagements, the Government of Canada gathered input on proposed legislative changes to the registration provisions in the Indian Act and implementation options.
Discussions also touched on broader issues relating to the Indian Act. To find out more about the issues raised during the consultations, visit Remaining inequities related to registration and membership and Getting out of the business of Indian registration.
While all known sex-based inequities in the registration provisions have now been eliminated, the Government of Canada continues to collaborate with First Nations and other partners to address the remaining inequities in registration.
This video briefly outlines the changes Bill S‑3 brought about in the registration provisions:
How S-3 changed the Indian Act
To find out more about Bill S-3, visit The Government of Canada's response to the Descheneaux decision.
What changes did Bill S-3 bring to the Indian Act
Bill S-3 addresses known sex-based inequities in the registration provisions of the Indian Act for these situations:
- the cousins issue (December 2017): differential treatment of first cousins whose grandmother lost her entitlement to registration due to a marriage with a non- entitled man before April 17, 1985
- the siblings issue (December 2017): differential treatment of women who were born outside of marriage to entitled fathers between September 4, 1951 and April 17, 1985
- the omitted minor children issue (December 2017): differential treatment of minor children who were born of entitled parents or of an entitled mother between September 4, 1951 and April 17, 1985 but could lose entitlement to registration if they were still minors at the time of their mother's subsequent marriage to a non-entitled man
- the unknown or unstated parent issue (December 2017): in response to the Ontario Court of Appeal's Gehl decision, Bill S-3 provides flexibility for the Indian Registrar to consider various forms of evidence in determining entitlement to registration in situations of an unknown or unstated parent, grandparent or other ancestor
- the removal of the 1951 cut-off date (August 2019): ensuring the entitlement of all descendants of women who lost status or whose names were removed from band lists for marrying a non-entitled man going back to 1869, which recognizes descendants of women who married non-entitled men the same as descendants of men who married non-entitled women
Are you now entitled to registration under Bill S-3
Generations of persons, including those who may have been previously denied entitlement, are now entitled to registration.
These videos depict possible scenarios in which the legislative changes may affect you or someone you know:
Scenario 1: Eligibility for Indian status under S-3
Scenario 2: Eligibility for Indian status under S-3
How to apply for Indian status
How Bill S-3 has changed the Indian Act
Reporting to Parliament
Bill S-3 also required that the minister responsible for the Indian Act report to Parliament on:
- the design of the consultations
- the status of the consultations
- the implementation of the bill
- Report to Parliament on the Review of S-3 tabled on December 11, 2020
The Government of Canada's engagement with First Nations and Indigenous groups
In keeping with the commitment to reconciliation and a renewed nation-to-nation relationship with Indigenous peoples, the Government of Canada has committed to work with First Nations and other partners in making legislative changes to address registration concerns as well as broader issues.
Since the full implementation of Bill S-3, the Government of Canada has continued to engage with First Nations and Indigenous groups and address remaining inequities in registration.
The Government of Canada has also developed a national monitoring approach to identify, evaluate and assess the effects of Bill S-3. To find out more about those activities, visit Implementation of Bill S-3: Engaging on changes to registration.
Related links
- An Act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général)
- Plain text description of Bill S-3, An Act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général)
- Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général)
- Stewart Clatworthy's report: An assessment of the population impacts of select hypothetical amendments to section 6 of the Indian Act
- Report to Parliament: Gender Equity in Indian Registration Act
- Explanatory paper: Proposed amendments to the Indian Act affecting Indian registration, McIvor v. Canada, March 2010
- Estimates of demographic implications from Indian registration amendment, McIvor v. Canada, March 2010
- Discussion paper: Changes to the Indian Act affecting Indian registration and band membership, McIvor v. Canada